<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>x + 3 &#187; HTML</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xplus3.net/tag/html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xplus3.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 01:05:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Redesign: x + 3 v2</title>
		<link>http://xplus3.net/2010/08/09/redesign-2/</link>
		<comments>http://xplus3.net/2010/08/09/redesign-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 11:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Brinley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Etcetera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xplus3.net/?p=320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been remiss in calling attention to the redesign launched here a few months ago. May thanks to Stephanie for helping with the design. There&#8217;s still a fair amount of tweaking to be done (isn&#8217;t there always?), and I can&#8217;t promise universal browser support. I&#8217;m experimenting with a few newer CSS features. Notably: Headers use the Republikaps font, loaded using &#8230; <a href="http://xplus3.net/2010/08/09/redesign-2/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been remiss in calling attention to the redesign launched here a few months ago. May thanks to <a href="http://www.adeliedesign.com">Stephanie</a> for helping with the design.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s still a fair amount of tweaking to be done (isn&#8217;t there always?), and I can&#8217;t promise universal browser support.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m experimenting with a few newer CSS features. Notably:</p>
<ul>
<li>Headers use the Republikaps font, loaded using <code>@font-face</code></li>
<li>A fair number of drop-shadows are scattered throughout</li>
<li>The border of the main content area is a combination of two rounded-corner boxes, the inner with a drop-shadow, the outer with an inset drop-shadow (note that due to a <a href="http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=29427">bug in WebKit</a>, Safari and Chrome users may see a square outer border)</li>
</ul>
<p>Much of the above won&#8217;t be visible to the 6% of my readers still on Internet Explorer. Frankly, I&#8217;m alright with that. In the past month, Opera&#8217;s 1.69% among visits to this site outranks IE6 and IE7 combined.</p>
<p>Let me know what you think, or call my attention to any bugs you might notice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://xplus3.net/2010/08/09/redesign-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Browser Statistics</title>
		<link>http://xplus3.net/2009/11/07/browser-statistics/</link>
		<comments>http://xplus3.net/2009/11/07/browser-statistics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Brinley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safari]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xplus3.net/?p=235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My general rule for browser compatibility when I develop a site is to follow a simple formula: if a browser has a 5% or larger share, make sure the site works on that browser, with or without JavaScript. If it&#8217;s under 5%, make sure it works so long as JavaScript is enabled (since JavaScript can be used to work around &#8230; <a href="http://xplus3.net/2009/11/07/browser-statistics/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My general rule for browser compatibility when I develop a site is to follow a simple formula: if a browser has a 5% or larger share, make sure the site works on that browser, with or without JavaScript. If it&#8217;s under 5%, make sure it works so long as JavaScript is enabled (since JavaScript can be used to work around a lot of bugs). If it&#8217;s under 1%, just ignore it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m in the preliminary stages of thinking about a re-design for this site, so I thought it would be interesting to look at the browser statistics for my readers before I get going. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the breakdown for the last month, by browser (including those 1% and above):</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Browser</th>
<th>Visitors</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Firefox</td>
<td>66.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Internet Explorer</td>
<td>10.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Safari</td>
<td>8.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Chrome</td>
<td>8.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Opera</td>
<td>3.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mozilla</td>
<td>2.2%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The order changes a bit when you break it down by browser version (again, only those 1% and above):</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Browser</th>
<th>Version</th>
<th>Visitors</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Firefox</td>
<td>3.5.x</td>
<td>49%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Firefox</td>
<td>3.0.x</td>
<td>17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Safari</td>
<td>4.0.x</td>
<td>8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Internet Explorer</td>
<td>8.0</td>
<td>6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Chrome</td>
<td>3.0.x</td>
<td>6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Internet Explorer</td>
<td>7.0</td>
<td>4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Opera</td>
<td>9.80</td>
<td>3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mozilla</td>
<td>1.9.x</td>
<td>2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Firefox</td>
<td>2.0.x</td>
<td>1%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Notice a browser not on that list? That&#8217;s right, fewer than 1% of my visitors use IE 6. As far as I&#8217;m concerned, that browser version is no longer supported for this site. It can hang out in the corner with Camino, Konquerer, and Firefox 1.5.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also surprised by both the high position of Safari on the list and the low position of IE 7. It seems that a lot more people with Macs read this site than I expected (24% of my visitors) and that the IE users are actually upgrading (and if you haven&#8217;t yet, <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/Internet-explorer/default.aspx">please do so now</a>; it would be nice to get IE 7 under that 1% mark, too).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still not to the point where I can rely on visitor&#8217;s browsers supporting much of CSS3, in large part due to the still-high position of Firefox 3.0.x. I anticipate that number dropping significantly in the coming months, though, so I may revisit this before I get around to actually doing a re-design. Overall, I would say things are trending in an agreeable direction, though (thank you!).</p>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> I should make it clear that the above conclusions only apply to this site, and have little bearing on other websites I develop. Unfortunately, IE 6 still has a strong impact elsewhere on the Internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://xplus3.net/2009/11/07/browser-statistics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

